Bicycle streets in Oslo : Evaluation of two pilot projects

The bicycle priority street in Løvenskiolds gate is perceived as an improvement. Cyclists report better accommodation, clearer legibility, and a stronger sense of being part of the cycle network, while pedestrians experience increased safety. The continuous footways show mixed effects. In Løvenskiolds gate the solution is viewed as slightly safer than the former pedestrian crossing, whereas pedestrians in Vetlandsveien feel less safe after the redesign, likely due to uncertainty about right-of-way rules. These rules are often misunderstood, and many road users are unaware that drivers must yield to both pedestrians and cyclists on continuous footways. Video observations reveal few actual conflicts, but many situations where users negotiate priority in practice. Pavement cycling was uncommon both before and after the intervention, but declined somewhat following the redesign, suggesting that the bike prioritising encourages cycling in the roadway. Universal design depends strongly on clear visual and tactile cues. Continuous footways with good contrast and warning fields function best, while lack of such cues can create a false sense of security for visually impaired users. Wheelchair users benefit from smooth, kerb-free surfaces that improve comfort and accessibility.